Engineer examples
For pharmaceuticals teams

Quality documents, prepared. Your QA team, in control.

Prepare PQRs, organize CTD quality content, and review supporting records with an AI Engineer trained on your procedures. Your specialists retain the judgment and approval.

Meet your AI Engineer
WORKFLOW DEMOCollect quality records
WorkspacePharmaceutical QA EngineerCW
Preparing documentIn progress
WORKING DRAFT

Assignment overview

Coxwave used work procedures and questions with QA specialists to reproduce the document preparation process, from source discovery and template mapping to narrative writing and verification policies.

3 connected sourcesTeam review required
Gathering source material

Select a record to inspect its context.

RecordFindingReview
HANDOVER NOTE

A PQR prepared in your required format, with source references, discrepancies, and unresolved items ready for QA review.

Prepared by Pharmaceutical QA Engineer01
Collect quality recordsLinking the material used in this assignment.
Just now
End-to-end documentation for quality teams

From quality records to review-ready documents.

Bring the work behind PQRs and CTD quality documentation into one connected process. Your Engineer collects evidence, applies your procedures, and prepares the material your specialists need to review.

EXPLORE THE CAPABILITIES
01 / 04
01 / Pharmaceuticals workflows
Product Quality ReviewReporting period / draft for QA review
DRAFT FOR REVIEW
01
Product & batch summarySAP · ERP records
02
Quality review narrativeWork instructions · quality events
03
Open review itemsSource-linked findings
Prepared for your team ↗
PQR draft / QA approval required
Built from enterprise experience

Grounded in the work your specialists do.

Coxwave project experience

JW Pharmaceutical

PQR writing automation

The work behind the Engineer

A PQR draws on records spread across enterprise systems, spreadsheets, and laboratory documents. Specialists gather the evidence, map every section, and write the narrative while checking accuracy throughout.

Coxwave used work procedures and questions with QA specialists to reproduce the document preparation process, from source discovery and template mapping to narrative writing and verification policies.

Scope and implementation

PQR and CTD share evidence, but serve different purposes

PQR supports periodic product and process review. The Common Technical Document organizes information used in regulatory applications. For quality documentation, Module 3 contains the detailed body of information, while Module 2.3 provides the Quality Overall Summary. An Engineer can help gather, map, and draft this material from your approved sources. CTD work is scoped with QA, CMC, and regulatory colleagues; it is a separate workflow from PQR preparation, with its own structure and review criteria.

Capture the decisions that a template cannot explain

The difficult parts of document preparation often sit between the fields: which record takes precedence, how an unusual case should be described, and what requires further explanation. Coxwave captures those conventions through work procedures, expert questions, and paired examples of source material and completed reports. Case-specific knowledge packs make that reasoning available to the Engineer instead of leaving it in one specialist’s memory.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Find a starting point for your next conversation with us.

PQR preparation is grounded in Coxwave’s pharmaceutical project experience. CTD quality-content preparation is an additional workflow to configure with your QA, CMC, and regulatory specialists, using your source documents, dossier structure, and review criteria.

Put krewa to work on your process.

Tell us about the work, the materials your team uses, and the result you need. We’ll discuss the workflow, the checks it requires, and a practical scope for getting started.

A description of the task is enough to start. We can work through the technical requirements together.