Read every application.Make the decision yourself.

Spend less time checking pitch decks and more time evaluating opportunities. Your AI Engineer compares company claims with supporting documents and flags gaps, so reviewers know what to ask before making a decision.

Meet your AI Engineer Explore the workflows

BUILT FOR YOUR TEAM

Less preparation.
More expertise.

Prepare

Less time gathering facts

Free up time for assessing opportunities.

Check

See beyond the pitch

Bring stronger questions to diligence discussions.

Decide

More time for judgment

Focus specialist attention on the investment decision.

01 / EXTRACT

Screen the submissions

Extract the information your program needs from application forms, presentation decks, business plans, and supporting files. Map it into a consistent profile, check required materials, and flag missing answers against the criteria your team sets.

A structured application profile and completeness findings.

02 / CROSS-CHECK

Check the supporting evidence

Compare material claims with the sources available to your team. Connect company information, market statements, and reported business figures to the underlying evidence. Mark unsupported or contradictory claims as questions for review rather than turning them into confident conclusions.

An evidence map showing supported findings and open questions.

03 / ASSESS

Apply your review framework

Organize findings under the dimensions your reviewers use, such as team, market, product, traction, and financial assumptions. Compare the application with your agreed criteria and prepare a preliminary assessment that makes the reasoning and missing information visible.

A preliminary assessment in your team’s review structure.

04 / HAND OVER

Prepare the decision brief

Bring the application summary, source references, assessment findings, and unresolved questions into one review pack. Prepare the material for reviewer discussion and further investigation. The authorized investment or program committee retains the decision.

A review-ready brief with evidence and questions for the team.

CONNECTED SYSTEMS

Your tools.
Connected to the work.

Start with the materials your team already uses. Coxwave configures the access, mappings, and handling rules around your environment.

01 / INPUTS

Applications

Submission forms, documents, and presentation files

Application form

Pitch deck

Supporting documents

02 / CONTEXT

External sources

Available evidence for checking material claims

Claim-checking evidence

03 / KNOWLEDGE

Review criteria

Your program’s assessment framework

Assessment criteria
Evidence requirements
Reviewer guidance

04 / DELIVERABLES

Assessment reports

Prior examples and the required output format

Investment assessment report

CompanyClaimEvidenceReview

HUMAN IN CONTROL

The context to decide.
The authority stays with you.

See what needs attention and the evidence behind it. Your team decides what happens next.

Example review

A claim needs supporting evidence

Finding: A material claim is not yet supportedEvidence and assessment criteria
Source: Pitch deck → supporting documents
Your decision: The review team considers the open question alongside the evidence. Investment judgment stays with people.

Review owner: Investment review team

Evidence before conclusions

Distinguish supported findings from unverified claims.

Consistent review criteria

Apply the team’s framework across submitted materials.

Human investment decisions

Keep the final investment judgment with the review team.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Find a starting point for your next conversation with us.

No. The role is for investment, corporate venture, accelerator, and startup program teams. The SK Telecom project is the experience behind the approach, rather than an industry restriction.