Get the evidence ready.Give reviewers time to review.

Spend less time gathering audit documents and matching them by hand. Your AI Engineer links records to supporting evidence and flags missing or inconsistent information, so your team can focus on the items that need review.

Meet your AI Engineer Explore the workflows

BUILT FOR YOUR TEAM

Less preparation.
More expertise.

Prepare

Evidence in one place

Reduce time spent gathering review materials.

Check

Catch mismatches earlier

Reduce avoidable rework during review.

Decide

A clearer review handover

Give reviewers more time for professional analysis.

01 / COLLECT

Evidence collection & organization

Locate the documents needed for the agreed review scope. Organize them by request, period, and subject so the team can find the relevant supporting materials.

An evidence index linked to the request list.

02 / MATCH

Evidence-to-requirement mapping

Associate each document and relevant record with the requirement it supports. Keep source references available and identify requests without supporting material.

Requirements mapped to supporting evidence.

03 / CHECK

Completeness & consistency review

Apply the agreed checks to the collected materials. Flag missing evidence, inconsistent values, and items that need a reviewer’s interpretation.

A checklist of findings and unresolved items.

04 / PREPARE

Working-paper preparation

Assemble the evidence and findings in your working-paper format. Give reviewers the context needed to resolve open questions and form their own conclusions.

Working papers ready for professional review.

CONNECTED SYSTEMS

Your tools.
Connected to the work.

Start with the materials your team already uses. Coxwave configures the access, mappings, and handling rules around your environment.

01 / INPUTS

Evidence repository

Documents and records within the agreed scope

Source documents

Transaction records

Supporting evidence

02 / CONTEXT

Request lists

Evidence requirements and completion status

Evidence request list

03 / KNOWLEDGE

Spreadsheets

Supporting schedules and working data

Supporting schedules
Source values
Working data

04 / DELIVERABLES

Review templates

Your working-paper structure and checklists

Working-paper template

RequestSourceFindingStatus

HUMAN IN CONTROL

The context to decide.
The authority stays with you.

See what needs attention and the evidence behind it. Your team decides what happens next.

Example review

An evidence request is incomplete

Finding: A required document is missingAgreed evidence requirements
Source: Request list → supporting record
Your decision: The authorized reviewer resolves the evidence gap and owns the professional conclusion and sign-off.

Review owner: Audit review team

Defined review scope

Limit collection and checks to the materials and requirements agreed with your team.

Evidence-linked findings

Keep each finding connected to the supporting record or missing requirement.

Reviewer authority

Professional conclusions and audit sign-off remain with authorized reviewers.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Find a starting point for your next conversation with us.

The role prepares evidence, checks, and working papers within your agreed scope. Audit procedures requiring professional judgment, conclusions, and sign-off remain with your authorized reviewers.